L2/05-276

Source: Mark Davis, Ken Whistler
Date: 2005-09-27
Subject: U+1DBF MODIFIER LETTER SMALL THETA

Rick, let's make sure that this one goes into the UTC bucket, so it 
doesn't get lost. (Ken's probably right about the disposition.)

Mark

Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> I think Charles Cox is correct here. The script assignment
> for U+1DBF is inconsistent with that of all the other Greek
> modifier letters (superscripts) in the same block. For
> Unicode 5.0, this character should be switched to the Greek
> script for consistency. (And you'll need to investigate if
> there are any implications for the data files for the
> security UTR's.)
> 
> --Ken
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Date/Time:    Sun Sep 11 11:27:45 CDT 2005
>>Contact:      charles@agenoria.fsnet.co.uk
>>Name:         Charles Cox
>>Report Type:  Error Report
>>Opt Subject:  U+1DBF MODIFIER LETTER SMALL THETA
>>
>>In the file http://www.unicode.org/Public/4.1.0/ucd/Scripts.txt, U+1DBF 
> 
> MODIFIER LETTER SMALL THETA is assigned to the Latin script. Should this 
> character be assigned to the Greek script as for U+03B8 GREEK SMALL LETTER 
> THETA, of which it is a superscript variant? 
> 
>>-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (End of Report)