Re: Comparison algorithms in UNICODE

From: Patrik Faltstrom (
Date: Sat Aug 19 1995 - 11:03:15 EDT

At 07.50 95-08-19, unicode@Unicode.ORG wrote:
>I also think it is a good move to go into the big character sets,
>but I think that you should call it ISO 10646 or UCS. UNICODE
>is in principle a proprietary standard. And encodings like
>UTF-8 are not UNICODE, but is 10646 and may well have
>a significant role to play in whois++

Good point!

We will pass everything we produce to this mailing list, and when
we do, please come with comments, even on things like this.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:32 EDT