At 9:57 AM -0700 6/13/97, Ned Freed wrote:
>I support the addition of an "unknown language" code to RFC1766. This is
>needed
>whenever text from one source is inserted into text from another, and the
>inserted text doesn't have lanugage tags on it.
Not to mention the use of imaginary or nonsense languages, which really
don't merit the creation of new codes.
I also wonder how the issue of various dialects is going to be addressed.
I personally am fluent in only one language (because I'm an American ;-7),
so all of my web pages have been in a single language. I wonder, aside
perhaps from character set configuration, what reasons there are for
defining the language of a block of text?
--------------------------------------------------------
[ Jordan Reiter ]
[ mailto:jreiter@mail.slc.edu ]
[ "You can't just say, 'I don't want to get involved.' ]
[ The universe got you involved." --Hal Lipset, P.I. ]
--------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:34 EDT