I agree. I also use a filter that worked nicely before but now doesn't.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peck, Jon [SMTP:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 9:29 AM
> To: Multiple Recipients of
> Subject: RE: Bring back the return address
> I liked it better the old way too, as my mail system has a filtering
> scheme that allowed me to put automatically the Unicode mail into a
> folder. Now I can't do that, since the rules engine doesn't see the
> entire header.
> I believe that the old way was the "wrong" way from the point of view
> the protocols, but it sure was useful.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bob Rosenschein [SMTP:Bobr@accentsoft.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 1:26 AM
> >To: Multiple Recipients of
> >Subject: Bring back the return address
> >Can't we change the mailing list e-mail sender back to
> >'firstname.lastname@example.org'? I liked it more two days ago, when
> >I could sort through my mail by sender, scanning the
> >prolific Unicode discussions at once.
> >-- Bob Rosenschein
> > Accent Software
> >E-mail: email@example.com
> >Work: +972-2-679-3723
> >Fax: +972-2-679-3731
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:35 EDT