Jorg Knappen wrote...
> Hmm... I think first of all, a canonical order of all combining
> needed. The combining marks fall into three classes:
> and above (maybe those wide combining marks form a forth class).
> you cannot reorder the combining marks within one class without
> the character:
There already is such a canonical order, and it's documented in the
book; and the data is available via FTP.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:36 EDT