Asmus Freytag writes:
> Providing a way to sidestep the need to repeatedly specify common
> behavior for such a large character set would be a welcome innovation for
> POSIX. I challenge the people maintaining the specification to come up with
> a way of achieving this.
We are doing some additions to POSIX syntax (backwards compatible)
to be able to ease the specification of big character repertoires
in the new standard 14652. We actualy work on 10646, of cause.
Keld
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:36 EDT