Sean,
My sources for 037 and 1047 agree with yours. Perhaps Ed was entering
data from a chart and misinterpreted CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT for TILDE and
just goofed on "dieresis" in CECP 037.
Ed's basic point that 1047 has the same repertoire as 037, with
6 code points stirred around, remains valid.
--Ken
----- Begin Included Message -----
Ed Hart's email shows these differences between CECP 037 and CECP 1047:
>> Code Point CECP 037 CECP 1047
>> 05F NOT ¬ TILDE ~
>> 0AD dieresis ¨ left bkt [
>> 0B0 TILDE ~ NOT ¬
>> 0BA left bkt [ Y-acute Ý
>> 0BB right bkt ] dieresis ¨
>> 0BD dieresis ¨ right bkt ]
yet my sources show that CECP 037 and CECP 1047 have these values at
those codepoints:
CECP 37
Codepoint Unicode Name
========= ======= =======================================
0x5F, 0x00AC, /* NOT SIGN */
0xAD, 0x00DD, /* LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE */
0xB0, 0x005E, /* CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT */
0xBA, 0x005B, /* LEFT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xBB, 0x005D, /* RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xBD, 0x00A8, /* DIAERESIS */
CECP 1047
Codepoint Unicode Name
========= ======= =======================================
0x5F, 0x005E, /* CIRCUMFLEX */
0xAD, 0x005B, /* LEFT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xB0, 0x00AC, /* NOT SIGN */
0xBA, 0x00DD, /* LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE */
0xBB, 0x00A8, /* DIAERESIS */
0xBD, 0x005D, /* RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET */
Any idea on why there are some discrepancies?
Sean O'Leary
Software Internationalization
Novadigm, Inc.
http://www.novadigm.com
----- End Included Message -----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT