Sean O'Leary is correct: I wrote my note on code pages 037 and 1047
too quickly and made mistakes. I've corrected them here. I believe
that the following table is now correct.
>> Code Point CECP 037 CECP 1047
>> 05F NOT ¬ Circumflex ^
>> 0AD Y-acute Ý left bkt [
>> 0B0 Circumflex ^ NOT ¬
>> 0BA left bkt [ Y-acute Ý
>> 0BB right bkt ] dieresis ¨
>> 0BD dieresis ¨ right bkt ]
I'm sorry for the mistake but thank Mr. O'Leary for identifying the
mistakes so that you have the correct information.
Regards,
Ed Hart
----------
From: Sean O'Leary [SMTP:seano@novadigm.com]
Sent: 23 October, 1997 14:53
To: Multiple Recipients of
Subject: CP037 / CP1047 discrepancies
Ed Hart's email shows these differences between CECP 037 and CECP
1047:
. . .
yet my sources show that CECP 037 and CECP 1047 have these values at
those codepoints:
CECP 37
Codepoint Unicode Name
========= ======= =======================================
0x5F, 0x00AC, /* NOT SIGN */
0xAD, 0x00DD, /* LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE */
0xB0, 0x005E, /* CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT */
0xBA, 0x005B, /* LEFT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xBB, 0x005D, /* RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xBD, 0x00A8, /* DIAERESIS */
CECP 1047
Codepoint Unicode Name
========= ======= =======================================
0x5F, 0x005E, /* CIRCUMFLEX */
0xAD, 0x005B, /* LEFT SQUARE BRACKET */
0xB0, 0x00AC, /* NOT SIGN */
0xBA, 0x00DD, /* LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE */
0xBB, 0x00A8, /* DIAERESIS */
0xBD, 0x005D, /* RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET */
Any idea on why there are some discrepancies?
Sean O'Leary
Software Internationalization
Novadigm, Inc.
http://www.novadigm.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT