That's exactly what I meant by the term "amendment". Long ago Mike Ksar had
that in fact such changes are only done by à posteriori amendments that's why i
used the expression "ussual practice in the standardisation field..".
I miss terribly the Guiness.
> Ar 12:13 -0700 1997-10-22, scríobh Lazaros.TOSSOUNIDIS@DI.cec.be:
> >Sir may I add,that the ECU you are reffering to has unfortunately been
> >registered as "EURO-CURRENCY SIGN" which is definately very misleading.
> >Specially now that the "Euro" is to be introduced (both in Unicode and ISO
> >10646). We have asked the corresponding bodies to foresee to change
> >this name via the usual practice in the standardisation field i.e.
> >by amendment.
> >Lazaros TOSSOUNIDIS
> >European Commission
> >IT Department
> It cannot be allowed to change the name of the EURO-CURRENCY SIGN, but I
> have requested that Unicode add an informative note specifying that this
> refers to the ECU in their next version, and I have asked Þorgeir
> Sigurðsson to forward a request for such annotation to the character name
> to be put into ISO/IEC 10646 Annex Q.
> Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
> 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland)
> Gutháin: +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
> 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT