RE: short Unicode names?

From: Fang (SOTECH Albert) (fang@sotech.com.cn)
Date: Sun Jan 04 1998 - 20:17:39 EST


Would you please stop it to me?
Thanks.

> ----------
> From: Herbert Elbrecht[SMTP:elbrecht@compuserve.com]
> Reply To: unicode@unicode.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 3, 1998 10:47 PM
> To: Multiple Recipients of
> Subject: Re: short Unicode names?
>
> >I'm not really interested in backward compatibility since Adobe names
> are
> >inconsistent anyway (cf. `mu' in Macintosh standard encoding vs.
> `mu1' in
> >WGL4 as used in Microsoft TrueType fonts). I'm rather interested
> whether
> >someone has created Adobe-like names already from the Unicode names--
> the
> >primary goal is a standardized glyph name database for TeX resp. its
> 16bit
> >successor, Omega.
> >
> > Werner
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> ----------------
>
> I started creating Adobe-like names from the additional Unicode names
> some
> time before - the problem as I can remember was with the more
> complicated
> precomposed characters, mostly to be placed in the Private User Area.
> While
> following the "Stacking Sequences" as of Figure 2-7 in Unicode
> Standard
> 2.0
> I used the names of diacriticals in its standard position "Mdot" -
> with
> additional
> "below" or "above" for variant positions of the diacriticals
> "Mdotbelow"
> only.
> Not having more than one diacritical at the same level, this worked
> for
> me.
>
> My listing was for precomposed characters for
> transliteration/transcription -
> but as no one at Apple told me (for whatever reason) how to do Unicode
>
> fonts for later MACusage, this being of no use I dropped the whole
> project.
>
> Herbert
>
> Herbert Elbrecht
> elbrecht@SinoIndoRoman.com
> http://www.SinoIndoRoman.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:38 EDT