John Clews asked...
> (a) whether "eyebrow repha" is achievable with UCS as it stands;
This thing is SUPPOSED to be achievable as the standard stands now. It was
discussed an considered long ago, but I can't recall what the resolution was,
and I can't find a mention in the book. It's either considered a glyphic
variant that would occur "naturally" in fonts supporting Marathi, or can be
encoded by some particular combination (which I can't recall).
> (c) whether it should be added as a new character within UCS.
It should not be added. The documentation should make a clear statement about it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:39 EDT