At 10:28 AM 10/14/98 -0700, you wrote:
>> This also seems quite exceptional for a Brahmic language;
>> attaching dependent vowels onto an independent vowel. Is that even allowed
>> in Unicode?
>
>Happens in Tibetan, too. There is only one independent vowel, and it takes
>various vowel signs.
>
> Rick
>
So then, it's not "illegal" to combine independent vowels with dependent
vowels; though, it is not often done?
mike
------------------------------------------
Michael Forgey
2201 W. William Cannon Dr. #224
Austin, TX 78745 USA
tel: (512) 441-7390 fax: (512) 441-7742
forgey@sprintmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:42 EDT