Doug Ewell wrote and Everson commented...
> > ... to include characters of debatable usefulness
> > rather than excluding them.
> No way! Include characters of limited usefulness, perhaps. But not of
> debatable usefulness.
I missed this one. Good call, Michael! Nobody wants things of debatable
usefulness. Either the committees as a whole are convinced of some utility,
and the characters go IN, or they're not convinced of utility, and the
characters stay OUT. (Luckily, nobody has to use or like every single
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:42 EDT