Rick McGowan wrote:
> The Unicode Standard, 2.0, pages 6-7ff, talks about this a little. These
> are not canonical equivalents, so please don't encourage that sort of thing.
> You might be able to get the right glyph displayed (i.e., regular "i" with a
> dot), but 0069+0307 is not equivalent to 0069 alone...
True. But naive uppercasing gives 0049 0307, which *is*
canonically equivalent to 0130.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT