John Fieber wrote:
> That ANSI C Normative Addendum 1 (see
> http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/na1.html) includes a mechanism for
> extending the isxxx() ctype functions. Does the uctype conform
> to this mechanism? Where standards exist, they should be
No, it doesn't, and thanks for calling it to my attention. While
I feel this is an ugly solution, it's easy to hack it in.
> Also, linux is all fine and dandy, but there are many legitimate
> reasons to use non-linux systems so a unicode framework that can
> be practically implemented on non-linux systems is important.
There's nothing Linux-specific or Unix-specific about uctype/ucdata.
-- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT