Re: CCCII and CNS questions (& EACC facts)

From: John H. Jenkins (
Date: Fri Jan 15 1999 - 11:59:36 EST

>No, my intent is a practical one. Since the available CCCII glyphs are
>very inconsistent in appearance I try to map to CNS as much as
>possible -- I use Omega (the 16bit TeX successor) for printing.
>Unfortunately, the CNS->Unicode mappings in the UNIHAN.TXT file are
>incorrect (not representing the latest CNS version).

*sigh* I know, I know. It's moderately high on my to-do list.

> Anyone working on identifying ideographs that are not in
> Unicode/ISO 10646 should make sure they know about the extensive
> work being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group. The IRG is
> responsible to WG2 for the analysis of ideographs. The IRG Web
> site is at
>Thanks for the pointer. But is there any CCCII related stuff? The
>Web page isn't very informative...

No. For some reason, the people responsible for CCCII have not been
involved in IRG work.

John H. Jenkins

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT