Re: Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Fri Jan 15 1999 - 13:10:04 EST

Next message: Joan Aliprand: "Re: CCCII and CNS questions (& EACC facts)"
Previous message: Frank Farance: "Metric Typography Units"
Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?"
Next in thread: Kevin Bracey: "Re: Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ken Lunde wrote:

> >> The characters that can be found in JIS X 0212 are given code
> >> points in the FA0E-FA2D range for round-trip compatibility, and a
> >> few characters that aren't found in the CJK area are also placed
> >> there.
>
> This cannot be correct.

Sounds like "can be found" should have been "cannot be found".

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

Next message: Joan Aliprand: "Re: CCCII and CNS questions (& EACC facts)"
Previous message: Frank Farance: "Metric Typography Units"
Maybe in reply to: John Cowan: "Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?"
Next in thread: Kevin Bracey: "Re: Origins of oddball CJK compatibility ideographs?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:44 EDT