Markus Kuhn scripsit:
> John Cowan wrote on 1999-05-30 15:52 UTC:
> > 20:22 into 10:22 PM
> 22:22 into 10:22 PM or
> 20:22 into 8:22 PM
Exactly! (Heh heh heh heh).
> [A]n objective analysis clearly speaks for the 24h format IMHO.
Oh yes, I agree. I was simply arguing against the claim that
20:22 is widely understood in the U.S.
-- John Cowan firstname.lastname@example.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT