At 11:49 AM 7/4/99 -0700, John Cowan wrote:
>No. That would make things worse, not better, for every kind of
>processing software except rendering software. There would be two
>ways of representing the semantic "j" (as there are five ways of
>representing the semantic "arabic jim"), one used with combining
>characters and one without.
<sarcasm type="off">
Okay, a fifth way. An "expert set" font with a dotless j, so that combined
diacriticals won't look dorky. *Now* am I getting it?
</sarcasm>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Biological Sciences Department Voice: (909) 869-4062
California State Polytechnic University FAX: (909) 869-4078
Pomona CA 91768-4032 USA jcclark@csupomona.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT