Unicode = ISO 10646

From: Arno Schmitt (arno@zedat.fu-berlin.de)
Date: Tue Jul 13 1999 - 06:25:09 EDT

Next message: Marion Gunn: "Re: dotless j"
Previous message: Arno Schmitt: "Re: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
In reply to: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
Next in thread: Arno Schmitt: "Re: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jonathan Rosenne wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arno Schmitt [mailto:arno@zedat.fu-berlin.de]
> >
> > There are some mistakes in the Hebrew encoding or/and the rules on
> > pages 6-20f.
> > The rule "There is never more than one vowel [mark] for a base
> > character ..."
>
>
> This rule should be deleted from Unicode. It has nothing to do with
> character coding.
>

I'm astonished that non of the gurus (= FAQ contributors)
protested.
Unicode is not ISO 10646.
Unicode is more than names, looks and code of chars, or is it?

Next message: Marion Gunn: "Re: dotless j"
Previous message: Arno Schmitt: "Re: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
In reply to: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
Next in thread: Arno Schmitt: "Re: disunifying Dagesh and Shuruk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT