This is not a problem, since 226E remains as is in Normalization Form C,
which will be the recommended form for XML.
John Cowan wrote:
> I wrote:
> > However, I will bring up the matter of U+226C in XML content to the
> > appropriate parties.
> That should have U+226E, as two vigilant recipients have pointed out.
> I have posted to the W3C i18n mailing list.
> John Cowan email@example.com
> I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT