In message <199912211030.CAA18741@unicode.org> "N.R.Liwal" writes:
> As computers are going to be multiligual, therefore the ISO two charachte> r
> of Roman Script may not be acceptable to certin nations, for instance
> in my country few people can read the roman script and can understand
> it. Therefore they will not like AFs or AFA for Afghanis.
But that's what is already in ISO 4217. It benefits international
trade in an increasingly global environment, that people dealing with
currencies of all sorts can use such codes (and I'm not sure of the
exact code for Afghani currency unit in ISO 4217).
Nothing says ISO 4217 codes have to be in use in Afghanistan if
Afghanistan prefers a different solution as a national standard.
-- John Clews, SESAME Computer Projects, 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG tel: 0171 412 7826 (day); 0171 272 8397 (evening); 01423 888 432 (w/e) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Committee Chair of ISO/TC46/SC2: Conversion of Written Languages; Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization; Committee Member of CEN/TC304: Information and Communications Technologies: European Localization Requirements Committee Member of the Foundation for Endangered Languages; Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC2: Coded Character Sets
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT