Re: Arabic & Arabic Extended Languages have 4 or 2 Glyps ...

From: N.R.Liwal (liwal@liwal.net)
Date: Fri Dec 24 1999 - 00:32:09 EST

Next message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: The amt. in chinese description is not coincidence with the n umeric description."
Previous message: addison@globalsight.com: "RE: mapping tables"
Maybe in reply to: peter_constable@sil.org: "Re: Arabic & Arabic Extended Languages have 4 or 2 Glyps ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks all for the help.

Liwal
----- Original Message -----
From: <peter_constable@sil.org>
To: Unicode List <unicode@unicode.org>

Next message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: The amt. in chinese description is not coincidence with the n umeric description."
Previous message: addison@globalsight.com: "RE: mapping tables"
Maybe in reply to: peter_constable@sil.org: "Re: Arabic & Arabic Extended Languages have 4 or 2 Glyps ..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT