John Cowan wrote:
> John Jenkins wrote:
> > For me, the AAT and OpenType mechanisms adequately answer this point, as
> > they allow full control over arbitrary (or automatic) ligature
> > overriding.
> I begin to suspect that people are talking past one another here. Allow
> full control to whom, using what? AFAIU (and I may not understand far
> enough), OpenType allows control to the font designer, not to the document
> author/transcriber. It is the latter for whom ZWL/ZWNL caters.
The font designer can specify a default behaviour, behaviour
tuned to particular languages as well as alternate (user selectable)
behaviour or glyphs.
You could provide several alternate ligature glyphs for a given
pair of characters which the user could select. Of course the
application has to provide an interface enabling the user to
select from these alternates.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT