RE: Language Tagging And Unicode

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 08:09:59 EST


Ar 11:30 -0800 2000-01-19, scr�obh Janko Stamenovic:

>> >Again I don't see then why Serbian t must be the same character
>> as Russian t
>> >in Unicode which already spent a lot of different characters for
>> "the same
>> >thing".
>>
>> Because it is historically the same character,
>
>How do you define "historically the same character" please?

Both derive directly from Old Slavonic letter tvrdo.

>If we find out that they were in pre-computer era printed differently, even
>if also then was much easier to use available Russian letter shapes, what
>would it mean about "historicaly the same"?

Yes. They would still both derive directly from Old Slavonic letter tvrdo.

Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT