Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements

From: Roozbeh Pournader (
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 07:20:35 EST

I somehow agree with Michael in this case. The reason for the need is
exactly the same as the reason behind a greek letter Omicron.

On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Michael Everson wrote:

> >Only if you are a strict scriptist. Otherwise, those are encoded in Latin1,
> >right?
> They are NOT encoded in the Universal Character Set, Mark, and we have gone
> over this again and again with the same arguments. Multiscript unilingual
> data in Kurdish cannot be correctly processed making Latin Q and W do
> double duty in two different scripts, the unification was bogus, and we
> need to add the two characters to the UCS.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT