Re: Paper on the (misnaming) of the Han

From: John Jenkins (
Date: Mon Mar 06 2000 - 13:36:08 EST

on 3/6/00 9:21 AM, Tom Emerson at wrote:

> Possibly, though I'm surprised that the IRG would make a mistake like that.
> I believe that it is also the case that Suzhou and Hangzhou are
> geographically close to one another. It is an interesting conundrum (at
> least to me). Unfortunately mail to the IRG has remained unanswered.

The IRG didn't name them. They -- and their names -- go back to Unicode
1.0, which is rather earlier than the IRG.

John H. Jenkins

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT