Re: Rationale wanted for Unicode identifier rules

From: John Cowan (
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 10:15:51 EST

Yves Arrouye wrote:

> (I take it that the last part after the comma is "a Unicode 3.0 generator")

No, 4.0 is correct (see previous posting).
> Or would this not be
> considered generation of symbols (it's a pass-through, so I'd say it's not
> generation myself)?



Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT