Erratim (Re: Vedic Characters & Unicode) (fwd)

From: James E. Agenbroad (jage@loc.gov)
Date: Tue Apr 11 2000 - 12:49:53 EDT


FYI

     Regards,
          Jim Agenbroad ( jage@LOC.gov )
     The above are purely personal opinions, not necessarily the official
views of any government or any agency of any.
Phone: 202 707-9612; Fax: 202 707-0955; US mail: I.T.S. Dev.Gp.4, Library
of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE, Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 09:28:22 -0400
From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@EMORY.EDU>
Reply-To: Indology <INDOLOGY@LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK>
To: INDOLOGY@LISTSERV.LIV.AC.UK
Subject: Erratim (Re: Vedic Characters & Unicode)

On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, John Robert Gardner wrote:

> was IS 13194:1991 (which is out of synch with Unicode 1.0, though unicode
> is a superset of ISCII:1991). Alas, Annex G is expressly excepted from
> ISCII-1991.

expressly excepted from Unicode, that is, not from ISCII:1991 -- sorry.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:01 EDT