Mark Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
MD> [SCSU] is specifically architected to work well for small,
MD> independent pieces of text.
MD> [...] minimize [runtime] memory requirements
Two good points. Both can be achieved with general-purpose
compression algorithms, slightly adapted. However, having to tweak
the available libraries sort of misses the point of using standard
algorithms in the first place.
MD> [BTW, it was also our experience that with larger files,
MD> compressing with SCSU then compressing with LZW produced better
MD> compression than LZW alone.]
I'm quite willing to believe this. However, I'd be surprised if the
difference were significant (as in: more than a handful of percent
with four fingers chopped off).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT