Instead of suggestions for renaming characters according to a particular
understanding of their usaga (it may even be a better understanding than
embodied in the original name), a more helpful thing would be for everybody
to start using the *full* unicode names list, including all the aliases and
explanatory information, as found on http://charts.unicode.org
For example the ASCII portion is at http://charts.unicode.org/PDF/u0000.pdf
A text only version of the information resides on the ftp site.
ftp://www.unicode.org/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt.
Or, you can refer to the nameslist and charts starting at page 335 in the
Unicode Standard, Version 3.0, ISBN 0-201-61633-5.
Within the bounds of practicality, Unicode will augment the information in
the annotated nameslist to provide shorthand information on the identity
and range of usage of a given Unicode character.
Even the annotated nameslist cannot cover all aspects of a character's
usage. More information on problematic characters, or overall script
behavior, is found in chapters 6-13 of the book. This information is not
available online.
To cut down on the reliance on the 'frozen' official name of a character,
it would be useful if those vendors providing character identification by
name could support access to the aliases defined by Unicode as well.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:03 EDT