Re: French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]

From: Robert A. Rosenberg (bob.rosenberg@digitscorp.com)
Date: Thu Jun 15 2000 - 15:34:43 EDT

Next message: brendan_murray@lotus.com: "Re: French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Previous message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: Pictograms"
Maybe in reply to: Antoine Leca: "French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Next in thread: brendan_murray@lotus.com: "Re: French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:52 AM 06/15/2000 -0800, brendan_murray@lotus.com wrote:
>Since Latin-1 was the
>encoding of choice prior to Latin-9 (and still is in many situations),
>there really are much more data encoded as 8859-1 than as 8859-9.

<finger-check>
Latin9 = ISO-8859-15 not -9.
</finger-check>

Next message: brendan_murray@lotus.com: "Re: French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Previous message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: Pictograms"
Maybe in reply to: Antoine Leca: "French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Next in thread: brendan_murray@lotus.com: "Re: French encoding [Was: Chapter on character sets]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:03 EDT