Mark Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Here is the issue. Because of the prevalence of UTF-16, and to
> preserve the round-tripping of UTFs to and from UTF-16 (even UTF-16
> containing mal-formed text containing non-characters and/or unpaired
> surrogates), a UTF must always roundtrip all codepoints between 0 and
> 10FFFF, inclusive.
Wait, now I'm lost. It was precisely *because* of UTF-16 that I thought
it was OK not to round-trip U+D800 through U+DFFF. After all, this is
a characteristic of UTF-16 itself. For example, it cannot round-trip
the following illegal sequence of four UCS-2 (pre-UTF-16) code points:
U+DC00 U+D800 U+DC00 U+D800
UTF-16 would regard this as the unpaired low surrogate U+DC00, followed
by the perfectly legal U+10000, followed by the unpaired high surrogate
U+D800. If I really intended to have four unpaired surrogates, I can't
use UTF-16 to represent them.
> It is of course permissible for a UTF converter to offer an option to
> detect and throw an error on any mal-formed text.
Then is it a conformance requirement to round-trip malformed text
(including illegal Unicode code points), or isn't it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT