Re: Zero-width ligator

From: Roozbeh Pournader (roozbeh@sina.sharif.ac.ir)
Date: Thu Aug 10 2000 - 13:47:45 EDT


That seems problematic to me, when used for Arabic. How should one use
ZWNJ between two Arabic letters to stop the ligature? The'll get
disconnected!

--roozbeh

On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:

>
> I inquired about that recently on the unicoRe list, and was told that the
> semantics of ZWJ/ZWNJ will be extended in 3.0.1 (or maybe it was 3.1). You
> mentioned that this decision was made at the meeting in February.
> Interestingly, I was at that meeting, and my recollection was that
> extending the semantics of ZWJ/ZWNJ was going to be given further
> consideration, after some people investigated the implications of extending
> the semantics of ZWJ, particularly for Indic scripts. But I left before the
> meeting was over, and the minutes reflect that a decision was in fact made
> (although the weasle word "provisionally" is used).
>
>
>
> - Peter
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Constable
>
> Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
> 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
> Tel: +1 972 708 7485
> E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:06 EDT