Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> From: "Rick McGowan" <email@example.com>
> > I suppose if you just want to display the non-ligature type
> thing in a
> situation where the font wants to give you the ligature type
> thing, you
> might be able to use a ZWNJ or ZWNBSP between the chars.
> Unfortunately, this will not work, as vowel reordering must
> happen, and will
> not if ZWNJ or ZWNBSP is included. [...]
ZWNBSP is not a good idea here; after all it is just a *space*.
But ZWJ and ZWNJ should be the way to go for this kind of things, especially
since they have been recently promoted to also represent ZWL and ZWNL
(zero-width [non] ligator).
It is very unfortunate that ZWNJ prevents Indic vowel reordering in this
In ordinary cases, a ZW[N]J inside a consonant cluster does not prevent
matra reordering. E.g., in Devanagari:
U+0915, U+094D, U+200C, U+0915, U+093F (ka, virama, ZWNJ, ka, i
is regularly reordered around the cluster:
093F, 0915, 094D, 200D, 0915 (i matra, ka, virama, ZWNJ, ka)
and rendered with this sequence of glyphs:
i_matra, ka_nominal, virama, ka_nominal
The ZWNJ is there just to mandate the non-default visualization of virama,
forbidding the regular renderings, that would be one of:
i_matra, ka_half, ka_nominal
depending on the font availability of a kka_ligature.
It would be nice if the possibility of reordering matras around a ZW[N]J
could be generalized, e.g. if:
U+0915, U+200C, U+093F (ka, ZWNJ, i matra)
would regularly reorders as:
093F, 0915, 200C (i matra, ka, ZWNJ)
producing the following sequence of glyphs
The ZWNJ would simply be there to prevent a hypothetical single-glyph
But, by which rule is this not possible? Can you refer to a passage in the
book or in a UTR?
Is it because of the rule that a ZWNJ preceding a "non spacing mark"
represents the mark in isolation?
In this case, I wonder, should that rule really apply to a character like
U+093F? After all, it is actually classified as a "reordrant vowel sign",
not as a "non spacing mark".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:13 EDT