> Michka wrote :
>Most seem to be okay with the addition of the country/region tag from
>ISO-3166 for determing the difference between languages spoken in several
>places -- this is usually what is done for English, Arabic, Portuguese,
>French, and Chinese, as well.
I don't see how one can use ISO-3166 regions. The region tags don't follow
linguistic breaks even if they are roughly geographic. For example, if I
wanted to describe the Northeastern dialects of Brazilian Portuguese that
have traits such as pluralizing the article but not the noun and a heavy
native Amarican Indian influence, I would be hard pressed to find an
ISO-3166-2 designation to use.
The region might be described as a set of states where the differences in
culture between the narrow costal strip and high desert interior is greater
that the differences between states.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:13 EDT