On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, D.V. Henkel-Wallace wrote:
> At 06:30 2000-11-14 -0800, Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> >But my point was: not even Mr. Ethnologue himself knows exactly *which*
> >combinations are meaningful, in all orthographic system. And, clearly, no
> >one can figure out which combinations may become meaningful in the *future*
> >-- e.g. when a previously unwritten language gets its orthography, or when
> >the spelling of an already written language gets changed.
> Sadly, it seems unlikely that any furture change or adoption of orthography
> will use characters not already supported by the then major computer
> systems. In fact the trend seems to be the other way, viz Spain's changing
> of its collation rules.
> For a minority language (which all remaining unwritten languages are) the
> pressure will be strong to use existing combinations (since they won't
> constitute a large enough community for people to write special rendering
Tuesday, November 14, 2000
I wonder if we could change the subject line to "Rendering Uncommon
Diacritic Combinations" or somethng similar since Devanagari is no longer
Jim Agenbroad ( jage@LOC.gov )
The above are purely personal opinions, not necessarily the official
views of any government or any agency of any.
Phone: 202 707-9612; Fax: 202 707-0955; US mail: I.T.S. Dev.Gp.4, Library
of Congress, 101 Independence Ave. SE, Washington, D.C. 20540-9334 U.S.A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:15 EDT