Addison Phillips wrote:
> This code is available in a number of places. A good one
> (embedded in a clear discussion of URIs and I18n) is
> located at:
This is a nice informative document, but to my knowledge, there are no
normative specifications to back it up. It's not even a W3C Recommendation.
Tague Griffith wrote:
>There is also an RFC which Martin Duerst et. al. wrote at:
This is not an RFC, it is an Internet-Draft that expired 2 months ago. It
even says 'It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
or to cite them other than as "work in progress."'
A post I made to the xml-dev list yesterday explains further:
Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources:
webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://skew.org/xml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:15 EDT