On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Otto Stolz wrote:
> So the questions are:
> - are the above-mentioned lower-case upsilon composites useless,
> and entered Unicode only by an oversight, or
> - are their upper-case equivalents missing by an oversight, or
> - is there indeed a rationale for this anomaly?
The Upsilons with smooth breathings are unacceptable word-initially in
Attic; the only exception I found in Liddel-Scott-Jones was the old name
of the letter itself, U)=. The lowercase glyph is acceptable in Attic,
because it can occur as the second letter of an initial diphthong; in
old typographies where all-caps words had accents, this can also occur
with capital upsilon. Upsilon with smooth breathing can additionally
occur word-initially in other dialects, but these two cases are rare
enough for no standard to rush to include it.
In our corpus, initial capital upsilon with a smooth breathing occurs 37
times in a corpus of 76 million words of Greek; lower case upsilon with a
smooth breathing occurs 373 times. With epigraphical data, this will obviously
be more frequent.
-- Nick Nicholas. TLG, UCI, USA. email@example.com; www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis Many among their proselytes had sold their lands and houses to increase the public riches of the sect --- at the expense, indeed, of their unfortunate children, who found themselves beggars because their parents had been saints. (Edward Gibbon, _Decline and Fall_.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT