Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in

Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:44:02 EST

On 02/20/2001 12:33:04 PM John Hudson wrote:

>The only thing that I insist on is that we maintain the distinction
>Roman and roman.

Which is?

>I wonder though, Peter, about your suggestion that '"Latin script" is less
>acceptable since "Latin" suggests something constrained to the language
>Latin'. Couldn't the same thing be said about 'Arabic script'?

Probably. I was just trying to nit-pick back at the nit-pickers. :-)

- Peter

Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT