Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:02:41 EST

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Previous message: Thomas Chan: "Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond"
Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in"
Next in thread: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 21:25 -0800 2001-02-20, [email protected] wrote:

>And perhaps the Mac people think of MacRoman as "8-bit ASCII."

No, we think of it as Mac Roman.

-- 
Michael Everson  **  Everson Gunn Teoranta  **   http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn;  Baile an Bh�thair;  Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in Unicode)"
Previous message: Thomas Chan: "Re: New BMP characters (was Re: [very OT] Documentation: beyond"
Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in"
Next in thread: Erland Sommarskog: "Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT