Re: bijective (was re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Perception ...)

From: Richard Cook (rscook@socrates.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 02:32:27 EST

Mark Davis wrote:

> > that must be made about what counts as an abstract character and what
> > does not; and the generally acknowledged desirability of supporting
> > bijective mappings between a variety of older character sets and
> while I like bijective, it is not a commonly understood term.

I think I'd like bijective too, if I knew what it meant. Someone?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT