Re: Klingon silliness

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Wed Feb 28 2001 - 05:50:48 EST

Next message: Florian Weimer: "Re: What about musical notation?"
Previous message: akerbeltz.alba: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit"
Maybe in reply to: John O'Conner: "Klingon silliness"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon silliness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 15:03 -0800 2001-02-27, David Starner wrote:
>
>Then why do you berate people for working on Klingon? They're probably
>no more an expert at the minority scripts than you are.

One begs to differ. ;-)

>They're just
>working on what they find interesting and are knowledgable about.

I guess in a bit I'll have to say something about all this Klingon silliness.

-- 
Michael Everson  **  Everson Gunn Teoranta  **   http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Mob +353 86 807 9169 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Vox +353 1 478 2597
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn;  Baile an Bh�thair;  Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: Florian Weimer: "Re: What about musical notation?"
Previous message: akerbeltz.alba: "Re: CJKV ideographic, was Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit"
Maybe in reply to: John O'Conner: "Klingon silliness"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Klingon silliness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT