> > > A joint glossary
> > > would be useful.
> > An editor who volunteers to produce the joint glossary would also be
> > useful.
> I have actually an action item to do a paper in SC2 on the use of
And I'm toying with the idea of at least putting Unicode definitions side by
side with those in ISO/IEC 10646, though I haven't yet convinced myself that
that would get us very far.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:20 EDT