All my unicode messages go to a folder which I read when I have
time. Messages that include me on the header however go to my inbox
so that I see them sooner. So deleting the header names will bury
the messages.
Personally, I don't think we should be tuning headers this much.
There are no standards for headers, so every list is different,
and people can buy a mail
product that has sufficient filters to do what they want...
(Now all the perl people don't jump in with your favorite
script to do whatever...)
If we tweak the list for everyone that has a special filtering
requirement, then it will always be changing and no ones filters
will be assured of working.
It's the contra to "It ain't broke, don't fix it.":
"OK it's broke, work around it."
(Sorry to disagree Marion...)
tex
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Carl W. Brown wrote:
>
> > I find that unless you have a recipient that is not on the Unicode mailing
> > list it is best to clear all other recipients.
> >
> > 1) It save the person from receiving 2 messages that are duplicates.
>
> But the person may have been using filters that assign some priority to
> the messages if they are listed in the "To:" field (this is the default
> mode in pine, which is a really common mailer; it marks these kinds of
> messages with a plus sign).
>
> --roozbeh
-- According to Murphy, nothing goes according to Hoyle. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin Director, International Business mailto:Texin@Progress.com +1-781-280-4271 Fax:+1-781-280-4655 Progress Software Corp. 14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sign up now for PROGRESS Worldwide Exchange 2001-Jun-03..07, Washington DC. http://www.progress.com/exchange
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:15 EDT