RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Apr 20 2001 - 18:19:32 EDT

Next message: Jonathan Rosenne: "Re: Unicode editing"
Previous message: Markus Scherer: "ICU charset mapping table collection online"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Next in thread: Edward Cherlin: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Reply: Edward Cherlin: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 03:50 PM 4/20/01 -0500, jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com wrote:
>I say 0 and 1 are adequate. I find this discussion rather pointless
>since we all already know that ASCII is adequate if the given premise
>is that ASCII is adequate. I don't see what's there to discuss.

We are just trying to see if tautologies still work as advertised or
if the need to be updated.

A./

Next message: Jonathan Rosenne: "Re: Unicode editing"
Previous message: Markus Scherer: "ICU charset mapping table collection online"
In reply to: jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Next in thread: Edward Cherlin: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Reply: Edward Cherlin: "RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT