Doug Ewell wrote...
> Cyrillic was created as a better way to write Slavic languages, Russian in
> particular. Shavian and Deseret were created as better ways to write
> English. The former met with overwhelming success, the latter did not
It's usual to bind "former" and "latter" to the closest preceeding pair of
items, which led me to think you were talking of Shavian versus Deseret,
and that was moderately confusing. Shavian certainly can't be counted an
overwhelming success when compared to Deseret...
In case anyone else is boggled... "Former" actually refers to Cyrillic and
"latter" to Shavian and Deseret together.
Rick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 10:22:52 EDT