Re: Is 879,309 enough?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:41:42 EST

Previous message: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston): "RE: Is 879,309 enough?"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Reply: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Jenkins said:

>Ah, but you should never underestimate the power of the Force.
>Remember that the IRG is *already* looking to adding some 60,000
>ideographs for Extension C.

Where do they find these things?

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland
Telephone +353 86 807 9169 *** Fax +353 1 478 2597 (by arrangement)

Previous message: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston): "RE: Is 879,309 enough?"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Reply: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Nov 06 2001 - 15:25:28 EST