Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo

• Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode?"
• In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Kaplan wrote,

> From: <Peter_Constable@sil.org>
>
> > Yes, we'll there's something weird about your pages because I've done
> > those things, and I can't even view plane 0 Chinese characters in those
> > pages properly, regardless of whether I use the font-specified,
> > no-font-specified or weft versions.
>
> You mean Extension A?
>
> There is a known bug in IE of all shipping versions that will not display
> Extension A unless you have the specified font (there is no "script range"
> to pick that will handle this range, a small oversight on their part).
>

This bug may have already been fixed.

I don't have the specified font, but can see Extension A glyphs just
fine on both the "font" and "no-font" versions. Didn't try the WEFT
version. This is on the Win M.E., MSIE 5.5 system.

The chart(s) numbered "1" at:
http://www.i18nwithvb.com/surrogate_ime/code_charts/

Best regards,

James Kass.

• Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode?"
• In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Nov 21 2001 - 02:49:39 EST