Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes"

From: DougEwell2@cs.com
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:28:50 EST

Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218)"
Maybe in reply to: J M Sykes: "Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 2001-11-29 8:58:42 Pacific Standard Time, tiro@tiro.com
writes:

>
> Please spread the word. My French colleagues are frustrated and embarassed
> by the continued propagation of this unfortunate myth.
>

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California

Previous message: DougEwell2@cs.com: "French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218)"
Maybe in reply to: J M Sykes: "Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 13:30:24 EST